Should parent be licensed

Only 6% of those who voted thought it was a terrible idea.Some have suggested that parents should also be licensed as a way of protecting their children by ensuring that have a base minimum skill set and knowledge about good parenting.To deny that i have identified the standard criteria of activities which should be regulated;Having children is a serious business.Raising a human takes patience, love, education, compassion, sympathy, and time.

You're also required to pass a test to drive a car, sell a house or be a lifeguard.Clearly, tittle believes that parents should be required to gain a license in order to bear and raise children.This is not a good idea.A potential parent might lose their freedom to raise children even before they've ever done anything bad to a child.The only ways to avoid this conclusion are to deny the need for licensing any potentially harmful activity;

You cannot just rip away a child from their parents like pandas do.I certainly don't want the government telling me how to.No one has the right to be a parent, for that implies the right to exert their will on another human being (namely the offspring) i get so.Parent licensing would restrict people's freedom and basically punish them for something they've never done.There are some who argue that parents should be licensed.

The typical response to this suggestion is an emphatic no.